Role of Non-state Actors in Disaster Response and Recovery

With Daniel Sledge, I am studying how non-state actors such as non-profits, faith-based organizations, and businesses coordinate with government during natural disasters. This work is funded by the National Science Foundation and involves extensive field research in areas impacted by recent natural disasters in Texas, Florida, Puerto Rico, and California. Our research also includes a survey of non-state actors in each of these areas and analysis of indicators of social vulnerability, disaster response, and recovery.

Lobbying and Policy Advocacy

Timothy LaPira
(JMU) and I are exploring the size and scope of Washington’s revolving door, and its impact on interest representation.  Our bookRevolving Door Lobbying: Public Service, Private Influence, and the Unequal Representation of Interests is available from the University Press of
Kansas.  Our previous research has been mentioned in The HillPolitico Influence, and National Journal, and we authored a guest post on Washington Post’s Monkey Cage.  A follow-up article on the phenomenon of ‘shadow lobbying’ is currently in press and we are currently working with Kathleen Marchetti (Dickinson) on research that explores gender and lobbying, partially funded by a Carrie Chapman Catt Prize for Research on Women and Politics honorable mention award.

Mapping the Politics of Public Health: Threat Perception, Advocacy, and Policymaking

Public health is an inherently political matter, deeply intertwined with governing institutions, political disputes, and ideas about how government should act and why. With Daniel Sledge (UTA), I am co-direct the Health Politics Data Initiative, which systematically maps the politics of public health.  We treat specific public health threats and diseases as units of analysis and trace elite framing, policy advocacy, public attention, and government response over time.  Our project is funded by a UTA College of Liberal Arts “From Cure to Care: Advancing Human Well-being through Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences (iC2C)” seed grant.


Interest Groups and the Policy Process

Darren Halpin
(ANU) and I are working on research that examines the role of interest groups in the policy process (both in the US and in comparative perspective). I am presently building a comprehensive dataset of 1,400 national organized interests to support the analysis of groups’ policy advocacy strategies, media prominence, partisan ties, and position-taking on legislation in Congress.  With Bert Fraussen (ANU), we are also working on research from a new study of national interest groups in Australia.

Contagious Agendas

Screen-Shot-2012-10-11-at-10.39.11-AM-1024x467My previous research examines contagion and bandwagon effects in policymaking.  I argue that a process of ‘issue contagion’ explains rapid changes in the attention of policy elites as they struggle to attend to an array of pressing issues and problems.  To examine the conditions under which issue contagion develops, I build a computational model of agenda-setting behavior (AgendaSim).  A article in Cognitive Systems Research provides an overview of this modeling of contagion in policy systems. In my dissertation work, I tested the empirical implications of the model by applying it to observed patterns (e.g. the dynamics of bill introductions, public statements, and lobbying activity).

Policy Agendas Project

Screen Shot 2016-03-25 at 12.36.08 PMI previously managed the Policy Agendas Project (2011-2014) and now contribute to the project as an affiliated faculty member.  The Project provides 12 datasets on the national policy agenda, which include over 260,000 observations categorized by issue area. In collaboration with UT-Austin’s LAITS, the Project has launched a new, interactive website for the Comparative Agendas Project.